4.7 Article

Large-scale implementation of pooled RNA extraction and RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection

期刊

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 1248-1253

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.009

关键词

COVID-19; Diagnostics; Group testing; Infectious diseases; RT-PCR

资金

  1. Alon Fellowship
  2. Concern Foundation/American Friends of the Hebrew University Young Professorship Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Testing for active SARS-CoV-2 infection is a fundamental tool in the public health measures taken to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Because of the overwhelming use of SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription (RT)-PCR tests worldwide, the availability of test kits has become a major bottleneck and the need to increase testing throughput is rising. We aim to overcome these challenges by pooling samples together, and performing RNA extraction and RT-PCR in pools. Methods: We tested the efficiency and sensitivity of pooling strategies for RNA extraction and RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2. We tested 184 samples both individually and in pools to estimate the effects of pooling. We further implementedDorfmanpoolingwithapool size of eight samples inlarge-scale clinical tests. Results: We demonstrated pooling strategies that increase testing throughput while maintaining high sensitivity. A comparison of 184 samples tested individually and in pools of eight samples showed that test results were not significantly affected. Implementing the eight-sample Dorfman pooling to test 26 576 samples from asymptomatic individuals, we identified 31 (0.12%) SARS-CoV-2 positive samples, achieving a 7.3-fold increase in throughput. Discussion: Pooling approaches for SARS-CoV-2 testing allow a drastic increase in throughput while maintaining clinical sensitivity. We report the successful large-scale pooled screening of asymptomatic populations. R. Ben-Ami, Clin Microbiol Infect 2020;26:1248 (C) 2020 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据