4.7 Review

Evidence for the Use of Triage, Respiratory Isolation, and Effective Treatment to Reduce the Transmission of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 155-172

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa720

关键词

infection; prevention; LTBI; occupational health; healthcare worker

资金

  1. World Health Organization [2017/748478-0]
  2. Medical Research Council, UK [MR/K012126/1]
  3. ESRC [ES/P008011/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [MR/R010161/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that implementing multiple infection prevention and control measures in healthcare facilities can reduce the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, but evidence for the direct effectiveness of triage, isolation, or effective treatment measures is limited and of low quality.
Evidence is limited for infection prevention and control (IPC) measures reducing Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) transmission in health facilities. This systematic review, 1 of 7 commissioned by the World Health Organization to inform the 2019 update of global tuberculosis (TB) IPC guidelines, asked: do triage and/or isolation and/or effective treatment of TB disease reduce MTB transmission in healthcare settings? Of 25 included articles, 19 reported latent TB infection (LTBI) incidence in healthcare workers (HCWs; absolute risk reductions 1%-21%); 5 reported TB disease incidence in HCWs (no/slight [high TB burden] or moderate [low burden] reduction) and 2 in human immunodeficiency virus-positive in-patients (6%-29% reduction). In total, 23/25 studies implemented multiple IPC measures; effects of individual measures could not be disaggregated. Packages of IPC measures appeared to reduce MTB transmission, but evidence for effectiveness of triage, isolation, or effective treatment, alone or in combination, was indirect and low quality. Harmonizing study designs and reporting frameworks will permit formal data syntheses and facilitate policy making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据