4.5 Article

Land use changes in Southeastern Amazon and trends in rainfall and water yield of the Xingu River during 1976-2015

期刊

CLIMATIC CHANGE
卷 162, 期 3, 页码 1419-1436

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-020-02736-z

关键词

Amazonia; Upper Xingu Basin; Deforestation; Land use changes; Climate change; Mann-Kendall analysis; Hydro-climatological indicators

资金

  1. Center of Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, the Inter-Institutional Graduate Program in Applied Ecology (ESALQ/CENA-USP)
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)
  3. Sao Paulo Research Foundation [2013/20377-1, 2013/50180-5]
  4. NSF [EAR 1739724]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the early 1970s, the agricultural frontier of southeastern Amazon has undergone extensive land use changes. These alterations, combined with regional climate changes, have the potential to influence the hydrologic cycle at small to large scales. We evaluated a 40-year time series (1976 to 2015) of rainfall and water yield and related them to land use changes in the Upper Xingu River Basin (UX). We acquired data from six rainfall stations and four river gauges and mapped land use changes. Mann-Kendall trend analysis and Pettitt's change point detection were employed to describe annual and seasonal changes in the time series. Monthly water yield from the Xingu River was used to derive annual, seasonal, and monthly water yield, as well as the runoff coefficient. The largest changes in land use occurred during the last two decades and approximately 60,900 km(2) in the Upper Xingu Basin were deforested between 1985 and 2015. Rainfall in the Xingu Basin decreased by about 245 mm over the period but there was no trend in water yield. The number of rainy days and intensity of events also decreased, but the length of the rainy season and seasonal and annual water yield did not change. Although watershed deforestation has increased water yield in other Amazon rivers, the reduction in rainfall in the Upper Xingu Basin was high enough to mask this effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据