4.6 Article

Spatial association of anomaly correlation for GCM seasonal forecasts of global precipitation

期刊

CLIMATE DYNAMICS
卷 55, 期 7-8, 页码 2273-2286

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-020-05384-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFA0601503, 2017YFC0405900]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51725905, 51979295, 51861125203, U1911204]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2019ZT08G090]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global climate models (GCMs) are used by major climate centers worldwide for global climate forecasting, and predictive performance is one of the most important issues in GCM forecast applications. In addition to spatial plotting that illustrates anomaly correlation at individual grid cells, this study proposes a novel local indicator of spatial association (LISA) of anomaly correlation (herein, LISAAC) for GCM seasonal forecasts of global precipitation. LISAAC is built upon local Moran's I by relating anomaly correlation at neighboring grid cells to one another. While local Moran's I takes the grand mean of anomaly correlation as the benchmark, LISSAC considers the original value of anomaly correlation in the mathematical formulation. A case study is devised for the Climate Forecast System version 2 (CFSv2) seasonal forecasts, which are initialized in January, February, horizontal ellipsis , and June, of the global precipitation in June, July, and August. Three metrics-LISAAC, local Moran's I, and original anomaly correlation-are applied to investigate the predictive performance. In comparison with local Moran's I, LISAAC can identify clusters of positive, neutral, and negative anomaly correlations. In comparison with anomaly correlation, LISAAC can capture outliers of positive (negative) anomaly correlation surrounded by negative (positive) anomaly correlation. Overall, the results highlight that LISAAC can serve as a useful tool for evaluating the predictive performance of GCM seasonal forecasts of global precipitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据