4.8 Article

Temperature-dependent Battery Performance of a Na3V2(PO4)2F3@MWCNT Cathode and In-situ Heat Generation on Cycling

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 13, 期 18, 页码 5031-5040

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202001268

关键词

Sodium ion battery; rate performance; heat generation; ionic diffusivity; interfacial kinetics

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity, Energy Storage Program [DE-AC05-00OR22725]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excellent structural stability, high operating voltage, and high capacity have made Na3V2(PO4)(2)F(3)a promising cathode material for sodium-ion batteries. However, high-temperature battery performances and heat generation measurements have not been systematically reported yet. Carbon-coated Na3V2(PO4)(2)F-3@MWCNT (multi-walled carbon nanotube) samples are fabricated by a hydrothermal-assisted sol-gel method and the electrochemical performances are evaluated at three different temperatures (25, 45, and 55 degrees C). The well-crystallized Na3V2(PO4)(2)F-3@MWCNT samples exhibit good cycling stability at both low and high temperatures; they deliver an initial discharge capacity of 120-125 mAhg(-1)at a 1 C rate with a retention of 53 % capacity after 1,400 cycles with 99 % columbic efficiency. The half-cell delivers a capacity of 100 mAhg(-1)even at a high rate of 10 C at room temperature. Furthermore, the Na3V2(PO4)(2)F-3@MWCNT samples show good long-term durability; the capacity loss is an average of 0.05 % per cycle at a 1 C rate at 55 degrees C. Furthermore, ionic diffusivity and charge transfer resistance are evaluated as functions of state of charge, and they explain the high electrochemical performance of the Na3V2(PO4)(2)F-3@MWCNT samples. In-situ heat generation measurements reveal reversible results upon cycling owing to the high structural stability of the material. Excellent electrochemical performances are also demonstrated in the full-cell configuration with hard carbon as well as antimony Sb/C anodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据