4.7 Article

Achieving partial nitrification and high lipid production in an algal-bacterial granule system when treating low COD/NH4-N wastewater

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 248, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126106

关键词

Partial nitrification; Algal-bacterial granules; Biodiesel; Light irradiation; Free nitrous acid (FNA)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51708222, 51708301, 51608279]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP18H03403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Partial nitrification-Anammox process is an efficient and energy-saving method for nitrogen removal from low C/N wastewaters. In this study, partial nitrification was achieved in an algal-bacterial granular sludge system when treating low COD/NH4-N (309.4 mg L-1/ 2 13.6 mg L-1) wastewater under sunlight irradiation (R-S). Sunlight irradiation, algae growth and free nitrous acid (FNA) decreased the activity of ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) by 25.7% and completely inhibited the activity of nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB), resulting in a NH4-N removal efficiency of >= 99% and a nitrite accumulation efficiency of 96.5% in Rs. Compared with the control without sunlight irradiation (R-C), the algal-bacterial granules in Rs produced 34.7% and 13.1% more proteins and polysaccharides, respectively, and exhibited a higher structure stability. The lipid content in the algal-bacterial granules was 68.7 mg g-SS-1, which was about 2.1 times higher than that in the granules from R-C, making the algal-bacterial granule a value-added biomass. Meanwhile, the content of unsaturated fatty acid methyl esters increased remarkably due to the growth of algae (Stigeoclonium, Scenedesmus and Navicula). The combined stress of sunlight irradiation, algae growth and high FNA in R-S only slightly lowered the relative abundance of Nitro-somonadaceae (AOB family) from 7.5% to 5.8%, while Nitrospiraceae (NOB family) was severely inhibited and became undetectable. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据