4.7 Article

Dysfunction of pulmonary epithelial tight junction induced by silicon dioxide nanoparticles via the ROS/ERK pathway and protein degradation

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 255, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126054

关键词

Silica nanoparticles; Tight junctions; ROS; ERK; Protein degradation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21277078, 21607082]
  2. Natural Science Fund Project of Colleges in Jiangsu Province [17KJD330003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) are one of the most widely used types of nanoparticles across many industrial sectors, and are known to be present in the air year-round. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the potential adverse effects of SiNP exposure on pulmonary epithelial tight junctions, which serve as a critical barrier between the respiratory system and the circulatory system. In vivo studies confirmed that SiNPs decreased the protein expression levels of zonula occludens 1 (ZO-1), zonula occludens 2 (ZO-2), and occludin in the lungs of C57BL/6 mice. In vitro studies showed that SiNPs not only decreased the mRNA and protein expression of ZO-1 and ZO-2, but also decreased the protein expression of occludin in human bronchial epithelial (BEAS-2B) cells. In addition, SiNP exposure increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and activated extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERKs) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). The inhibition of ROS and ERKs effectively protected the SiNP-induced downregulation of ZO-1 mRNA and protein expression, but had no effect on ZO-2 or occludin expression. SiNP-induced matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) protein expression appeared to be involved in occludin proteolytic degradation, in addition to SiNP-induced direct occludin protein degradation. The present study suggests that SiNPs disturb pulmonary epithelial tight junction structure and function via the ROS/ERK pathway and protein degradation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据