4.7 Article

Using wood flour waste to produce biochar as the support to enhance the visible-light photocatalytic performance of BiOBr for organic and inorganic contaminants removal

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126291

关键词

Wood flour; Biochar; Visible-light photocatalyst; BiOBr; Organic pollutant degradation; Cr(VI) reduction

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51708297]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M661856]
  3. Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province (2020)
  4. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX18_0994]
  5. Project of National First-class Disciplines (PNFD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, industrial wood flour waste was selected for the first time as the precursor to produce biochar (WFB). The WFB was then used to prepare WFB/BiOBr visible-light photocatalysts, in which WFB acted as the carbon support to enhance the photocatalytic performance of BiOBr. Specifically, the impact of WFB pyrolysis temperature on the visible-light photo-removal performance of WFB/BiOBr was studied through degrading rhodamine B and reducing Cr(VI). The results indicated that when the pyrolysis temperature was 600 degrees C, the prepared WFB (600-WFB) had the highest graphitization degree, which afterwards significantly enhanced the visible-light photocatalysis performance of the BiOBr. Having higher graphitization degree, 600-WFB/BiOBr exhibited the highest photocatalytic capability. With a dosage of 0.5 g/L, the 600-WFB/BiOBr could completely remove to 20 mg/L of RhB and 5 mg/L of Cr(VI) within 90 min. Since wood flour is an abundantly existed industrial bioresource waste and easily pyrolyzed to prepare biochar, WFB is a promising alternative to replace traditional carbonaceous materials for the design of green and high-efficient visible-light photocatalysts for environmental remediation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据