4.7 Article

Long-term 1-nitropyrene exposure induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and inhibits steroidogenesis in mice testes

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 251, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126336

关键词

1-Nitropyrene; Testosterone; Steroidogenesis; ER stress; Reactive oxygen species

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91743105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1-Nitropyrene (1-NP) is a representative nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon from diesel exhaust. Recently, we found that maternal 1-NP exposure caused fetal growth retardation and disturbed cognitive development in adolescent female offspring. To investigate long-term 1-NP exposure on spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis, male mice were exposed to 1-NP (1.0 mg/kg/day) by gavage for 70 days. There was no significant difference on relative testicular weight, number of testicular apoptotic cells and epididymal sperm count between 1-NP-exposed mice and controls. Although long-term 1-NP exposure did not influence number of Leydig cells, steroidogenic genes and enzymes, including STAR, P450scc, P45017 alpha and 1713-HD, were downregulated in 1-NP-expoed mouse testes. Correspondingly, serum and testicular testosterone (T) levels were reduced in 1-NP-exposed mice. Additional experiment showed that testicular GRP78 mRNA and protein were upregulated by 1-NP. Testicular phospho-IRE1 alpha and sliced xbp-1 mRNA, a downstream molecule of IRE1 alpha, were elevated in 1-NP-exposed mice. Testicular phosphoPERK and phospho-elF2 alpha, a downstream molecule of PERK pathway, were increased in 1-NP-exposed mice. Testicular NOX4, a subunit of NAPDH oxidase, and HO-1, MDA, two oxidative stress markers, were increased in 1-NP-exposed mice. Testicular GSH and GSH/GSSG were decreased in 1-NP-exposed mice. These results suggest that long-term 1-NP exposure induces reactive oxygen species-evoked ER stress and disrupts steroidogenesis in mouse testes. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据