4.7 Article

The fate and toxicity of Pb-based perovskite nanoparticles on soil bacterial community: Impacts of pH, humic acid, and divalent cations

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 249, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126564

关键词

Lead-based nanoparticles; Nanotoxicology; Environmental conditions; Fate assessment; Bacterial metabolic potential

资金

  1. European Union Horizon 2020 Research Programme [760813 'PATROLS']
  2. NWO-VIDI [864.13.010]
  3. Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC) [201506510003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pb-based perovskite nanoparticles (PbPNPs) are amongst others used within highly efficient solar cells. PbPNPs can be released into the environment during their production, recycling or waste processing. In this study we investigated the fate and toxicity of PbPNPs on soil bacterial community under simulated natural environmental conditions across a range of pH, humic acid, and divalent cation concentrations. Increasing pH decreased PbPNPs-particle aggregation as well as Pb-ion release. The presence of only humic acid (HA) prevented the aggregation of PbPNPs-particles, whereas the presence of only divalent cations promoted the aggregation of PbPNPs-particles. The amount of Pb-ions released from the PbPNPs-particles was reduced in the presence of either HA or the divalent cations. Results of toxicity testing of PbPNPs by determining the metabolic potential of a bacterial community indicated that increasing pH alleviated particle toxicity. The presence of only HA reduced the toxicity of PbPNPs, while the presence of only divalent cations enhanced the particle toxicity. The coexistence of HA and divalent cations enhanced PbPNPs aggregation and reduced toxicity, with both Pb-ions and the interaction between the PbPNPs-particles and bacterial cells contributing to the toxic effects. Our study emphasized that environmental conditions play important roles that influencing the fate and toxicity of PbPNPs. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据