4.6 Article

Investigation of the Mechanism Behind Conductive Fluorescent and Multistimuli-responsive Li+-enriched Metallogel Formation

期刊

CHEMISTRY-AN ASIAN JOURNAL
卷 15, 期 19, 页码 3020-3028

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asia.202000630

关键词

metallogels; fluorescence; conductance; nanofibers; rheology

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India [IFA-14/CH-156]
  2. UGC New Delhi
  3. IIT Indore
  4. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University [RGP 1/181/41]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A fluorescent metallogel (2.6 % w/v) has been obtained from two non-fluorescent componentsviz. phenyl-succinic acid derived pro-ligandH(2)PSLand LiOH (2 equiv.) in DMF. Li(+)ion not only plays a crucial role in gelation through aggregation, but also contributed towards enhancement of fluorescence by imposing restriction over excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) followed by origin of chelation enhanced fluorescence (CHEF) phenomenon. Further, the participation of CHEF followed by aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ) and aggregation-induced emission (AIE) in the gelation process have been well established by fluorescence experiments. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis disclosed the sequential creation of nanonuclei followed by nanoballs and their alignment towards the generation of fibers of about 3, 31 and 40 nm diameter, respectively. The presence of a long-range fibrous morphology inside the metallogel was further attested by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Rheological studies on the metallogel showed its true gel-phase material nature. Nyquist impedance study shows a resistance value of 7.4 k omega for the metallogel which upon applying ultrasound increased to 8.5 k omega, while an elevated temperature of 70 degrees C caused reduction in the resistance value to 4.8 k omega. The mechanism behind metallogel formation has been well established by using FTIR, UV-vis, SEM, TEM, PXRD,H-1 NMR, fluorescence and ESI-MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据