4.6 Review

Growth and Atomic-Scale Characterization of Ultrathin Silica and Germania Films: The Crucial Role of the Metal Support

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 1870-1885

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202001806

关键词

amorphous structures; crystalline materials; germania; metal-supported films; silica

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program [669179]
  2. BESSY II crew
  3. Federal German Ministry of Education and Science (BMBF) [05KS4WWB/4]
  4. Italian MIUR
  5. Projekt DEAL
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [669179] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The review focuses on the preparation and atomic-scale characterization of the thinnest films of silica and germania, using advanced surface science techniques and density functional theory calculations. Comparisons of monolayer, zigzag phase, and bilayer films on different metal supports provide insights into the network structure of glass forming materials, highlighting the crucial role of metal support in the pathway from crystalline to amorphous ultrathin film growth.
The present review reports on the preparation and atomic-scale characterization of the thinnest possible films of the glass-forming materials silica and germania. To this end state-of-the-art surface science techniques, in particular scanning probe microscopy, and density functional theory calculations have been employed. The investigated films range from monolayer to bilayer coverage where both, the crystalline and the amorphous films, contain characteristic XO4 (X=Si,Ge) building blocks. A side-by-side comparison of silica and germania monolayer, zigzag phase and bilayer films supported on Mo(112), Ru(0001), Pt(111), and Au(111) leads to a more general comprehension of the network structure of glass former materials. This allows us to understand the crucial role of the metal support for the pathway from crystalline to amorphous ultrathin film growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据