4.8 Article

Surface Dipoles Induce Uniform Orientation in Contacting Polar Liquids

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 32, 期 18, 页码 7832-7841

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02471

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1710561, CHE-1610453]
  2. Robert A. Welch Foundation [E-1320]
  3. Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular interactions at the solid-liquid interface have a profound impact on the macroscale wetting properties of surfaces. Surface-specific sum frequency generation (SFG) spectroscopy, one of a limited number of techniques having the capability to probe such interfaces, generates a surface vibrational spectrum that is sensitive to molecular structure and is used to determine the orientation of molecules at the interface. This study utilized SFG spectroscopy to study the interactions between the polar liquid acetonitrile and selectively fluorinated self-assembled monolayer (FSAM) interfaces generated by the adsorption of CF3(CH2)(17)SH and CD3(CF2)(6)(CH2)(10)SH on gold; these SAMs exhibit strong oriented molecular dipoles at their chain termini. We used SFG spectroscopy to examine the C-N and C-H stretching regions, 2000-2300 and 2800-3050 cm(-1), respectively, to probe the solid-liquid interface of the FSAMs in contact with acetonitrile. The appearance of positive- or negative-going peaks in the SFG spectrum of acetonitrile as a function of the variation in the terminal group of the FSAMs could be attributed, to a first-order approximation, to the orientation (CH3 up or down) of the acetonitrile molecules with respect to changes in the direction of the FSAM dipole. Coherent molecular spectroscopy was used as a direct probe of this effect by examining the differences in the SFG spectra to determine the relative orientation of acetonitrile with respect to the underlying SAM and, therefore, provided direct evidence for the dipole-influenced wettability behavior of these unique model surfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据