4.7 Article

Construction of physically crosslinked chitosan/sodium alginate/calcium ion double-network hydrogel and its application to heavy metal ions removal

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 393, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124728

关键词

Physical hydrogel; Chitosan; Sodium alginate; Calcium ion; Double-network; Heavy metal ions adsorption

资金

  1. startup fund of medical & engineering integration science and technology project of Beijing Institute of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical hydrogels have been extensively applied to the removal of heavy metal pollutants. However, most of chemical hydrogels inevitably contain toxic chemical crosslinker residues, which impose serious threats on the environment. Herein, a novel eco-friendly physically-crosslinked double-network hydrogel of chitosan/sodium alginate/calcium ion (CTS/SA/Ca2+ PCDNH) was prepared by the combination of the semi-dissolution acidification sol-gel transition method with the internal gelation method. The PCDNH is formed via the physical crosslinking of sustainable biopolymers, which avoids the excessive use of toxic chemical reagents. In addition, the PCDNH exhibits significantly better mechanical properties than the single-network physical hydrogel crosslinked via electrostatic interactions, which overcomes the weak mechanical properties of physical hydrogels. The formation mechanism and structure of the hydrogel were determined by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), C-13 solid state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (C-13-SSNMR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The heavy metal ions adsorption mechanism was explored by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis. The adsorption kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamics were further studied to understand the adsorption mechanism. Our work has provided a new method for the fabrication of natural polymers-based eco-friendly, low-cost and robust physical hydrogels for the heavy metal ions removal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据