4.7 Article

A CdS@NiS reinforced concrete structure derived from nickel foam for efficient visible-light H2 production

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 393, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124774

关键词

H-2 evolution; Reinforced concrete structure; CdS; NiS; Synergistic effect

资金

  1. doctor foundation of Shandong province [ZR2019BB010]
  2. Qingdao Applied Basic Research Program [19-6-2-81-cg]
  3. Shandong Key Laboratory of Reactions and Isolations of Multi-phase Liquid [2019MFRSE-B03]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of National [NSFC21978141]
  5. Opening Project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Resource Processing and Process Intensification Technology [2019K010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-efficient noble-metal-free photocatalyst is vital to realize high H-2 evolution. In consideration of this, we design a CdS@NiS reinforced concrete structure derived from nickel foam (NF) via a simple one-pot oil bath strategy. The whole preparation process is started with the growth of NiS rods on NF. Subsequently, NiS rods are encased in CdS gradually under oil both conditions. After the combination of NiS rods and CdS, the photoelectrical properties of primeval CdS are greatly optimized, e.g., photoelectric responsiveness, impedance and light absorption capacity. Moreover, the H-2 evolution rate of CdS@NiS is increased significantly from 2706 to 40601 mu mol g(-1) h(-1) under visible-light irradiation (lambda > 420 nm), which is about 15 times higher than that of pure CdS, thereby confirming the excellent synergistic effect between NiS rods and CdS. Additionally, the photocatalytic performance of CdS@NiS was stronger than that of CdS/NiS-NPs (6726 mu mol g(-1) h(-1)) and CdS-NPs/NiS (1639 mu mol g(-1) h(-1)), highlighting the advantages of CdS (prepared using oil bath treatment) and NiS rods (originated from NF growth). Lastly, according to experiment data and DFT calculation results, a viable mechanism for CdS@NiS is tentatively proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据