4.7 Article

Efficient degradation of levofloxacin by a microwave-3D ZnCo2O4/activated persulfate process: Effects, degradation intermediates, and acute toxicity

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 393, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124795

关键词

Microwave irradiation; Persulfate; ZnCo2O4; Mechanism; Toxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three-dimensional ZnCo2O4 (3D ZCO) nanometer material was synthesized using a hydrothermal method. The obtained materials were characterized via XRD, XPS, SEM, HRTEM analysis techniques. 3D ZCO was used as heterogeneous persulfate (PS) activators under microwave irradiation for levofloxacin (LVF) degradation, in which influence factors, mechanism and probable degradation pathways were investigated in depth. Influences of reaction parameters such as initial pH, initial PS concentration, the dosage of ZCO and the influence of anions (NO3-, Cl-, CO32-, H2PO4-) were investigated. Radical quenching experiments and electron spin resonance studies proved that the contribution of active species was in descending order of SO4 center dot-> center dot O-2(-)> center dot OH in the microwave-3D ZnCo2O4/persulfate (MW-3D ZCO/PS) system. The feasible reaction mechanism of MW-3D ZCO/ PS system was proposed according to the characterization and experiments analysis. The experimental optimum conditions ([LVF] = 10 mg/L, [ZCO] = 2 g/L, [PS] = 5 mM, [pH](0) = 5, MW = 700 W, T = 70 degrees C) of mineralization of levofloxacin, reaching a 69.8% TOC removal. The acute toxicity test showed that MW-3D ZCO/PS system was effective at reducing the toxic compounds of LVF solutions lead to a reduction in toxicity. By high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analysis (HPLC-MS), eight products of LVF including H2O, CO2, inorganic ions and other small molecules were identified, and possible degradation pathways were then proposed. In short, this study provides a solution to decrease refractory antibiotic in water systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据