4.6 Article

Dihydrogen-Driven NADPH Recycling in Imine Reduction and P450-Catalyzed Oxidations Mediated by an Engineered O2-Tolerant Hydrogenase

期刊

CHEMCATCHEM
卷 12, 期 19, 页码 4853-4861

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202000763

关键词

hydrogenase; metalloenzyme; cytochrome P450; monooxygenase; oxidoreductase; imine reductase; octane oxidation; nicotinamide cofactor; NADH; NADPH; cofactor recycling; biotransformation

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC 2008-390540038, 405325648]
  2. Metals in Biology BBSRC NIBB [BB/L013711/1]
  3. EPSRC IB Catalyst award [EP/N013514/1]
  4. EPSRC DTA studentship, 2012 [EP/K503113/1]
  5. Berlin International Graduate School for Natural Science AMP
  6. Engineering (BIG-NSE)
  7. BBSRC [BB/L013711/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. EPSRC [EP/N013514/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The O-2-tolerant NAD(+)-reducing hydrogenase (SH) fromRalstonia eutropha(Cupriavidus necator) has already been appliedin vitroandin vivofor H-2-driven NADH recycling in coupled enzymatic reactions with various NADH-dependent oxidoreductases. To expand the scope for application in NADPH-dependent biocatalysis, we introduced changes in the NAD(+)-binding pocket of the enzyme by rational mutagenesis, and generated a variant with significantly higher affinity for NADP(+)than for the natural substrate NAD(+), while retaining native O-2-tolerance. The applicability of the SH variant in H-2-driven NADPH supply was demonstrated by the full conversion of 2-methyl-1-pyrroline into a single enantiomer of 2-methylpyrrolidine catalysed by a stereoselective imine reductase. In an even more challenging reaction, the SH supported a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase for the oxidation of octane under safe H-2/O(2)mixtures. Thus, the re-designed SH represents a versatile platform for atom-efficient, H-2-driven cofactor recycling in biotransformations involving NADPH-dependent oxidoreductases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据