4.2 Article

Simultaneous Determination of Phenolic Endocrine Disruptors in Water Samples by Poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) Modified CE Coupled with Hollow-Fiber Liquid-Phase Microextraction

期刊

CHROMATOGRAPHIA
卷 79, 期 9-10, 页码 619-627

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10337-016-3073-5

关键词

Endocrine disruptor; Water; Hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction; Capillary electrophoresis; Amperometric detection

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21205042]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry [SKLEAC201508]
  3. Daxia Foundation of ECNU [2014DX-077]
  4. Students Innovative Experimental Project of Shanghai Municipality [201510269070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A CE combined with amperometric detection method has been developed for simultaneous determination of nine environmental endocrine disruptors, including bisphenol A, methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, 4-tert-butylphenol, diethylstilbestrol, 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol, beta-estradiol and estriol. In this work, various experimental parameters affecting enrichment factors, electrophoretic separation and detection were investigated in detail. And poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) was selected as the buffer modifier, resulting in considerable improvement of the resolution of the target analytes. Under the optimum conditions, nine analytes could be well separated within 30 min in a 10 g/L poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) modified 60 mmol/L Na2B4O7-H3BO3 buffer (pH 7.60). For each analyte good linear correlation between electrochemical response and its concentration at two or three grades was obtained, the method detection limits reached 0.047-13 ng/mL (S/N = 3) with the assistance of hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction, and the highest enrichment factor was up to 255-fold. This proposed method has been applied for the direct analyses of real environmental water and tap water samples without need of derivatization, the average recoveries were in the range of 81.4-117 %, and the corresponding relative standard deviations were lower than 6.2 %.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据