4.7 Article

N-doped honeycomb-like carbon networks loaded with ultra-fine Fe2O3 nanoparticles for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 46, 期 11, 页码 17478-17485

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.043

关键词

Lithium-ion batteries; Fe2O3 nanoparticles; Nitrogen-doped carbon; Honeycomb-like structure; Anode

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21765009, 21964010, 21665012]
  2. Science and Technology Support Program of Jiangxi Province [20123BBE50104, 20133BBE50008]
  3. Open Project Program of Key Laboratory of Functional Small Organic Molecule, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Normal University [KLFS-KF-201919, KLFS-KF-201913]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-doped honeycomb-like carbon networks (N-HCN) loaded with ultra-fine Fe2O3 nanoparticles (Fe2O3/N-HCN) are proposed as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). TheFe(2)O(3)/N-HCN nanocomposites are prepared by freeze-drying of glucose-Fe(NO3)(3) solution, following by grinding it with urea, and finally annealing treatment. The N-HCN with dozen micrometer-sized macropores is composed of carbon nanosheets with a thickness of about 33 nm. A large number of 2-7 nm-sized ultra-fine Fe2O3 nanoparticles with an average size of 4.4 nm are uniformly arrayed on the wall of N-HCN. The Fe2O3/N-HCN nanocomposites exhibit good performances as anode materials for LIBs. After 500 cycles under a large current density of 5 A g(-1), the Fe2O3/N-HCN nanocomposites still show a reversible capacity of 408 mAh g(-1). The good performance can be ascribed to the uniformly dispersed ultra-fine Fe2O3 nanoparticles and unique honeycomb-like structure of N-HCN which provides a continuous conducive network to greatly promote the rapid transfer of ions and electrons, and effectively alleviate the volume fluctuation effect of Fe2O3 during charging and discharging. More importantly, the cheap and environmentally friendly glucose as raw materials provides possibility for green energy applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据