4.7 Article

Structure and morphology of calcium-silicate-hydrates cross-linked with dipodal organosilanes

期刊

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106076

关键词

Calcium-silicate-hydrate; Organic-crosslinking; Organosilanes; Structure; Morphology

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1825921, 1826122]
  2. Welch Foundation [E-2011-20190330]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1826122] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1825921] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coupling of organic and inorganic chemistry presents a new degree of freedom in nano-engineering of thermomechanical properties of cement-based materials. Despite these vast technological benefits, molecular scale cross-linking of calcium-silicate-hydrate (C-S-H) gel with organic molecules still presents a significant challenge. Herein, we report experimental results on sol-gel synthesis, structure and morphology of nanocrystalline C-S-H cross-linked with dipodal organosilanes. These novel organic-inorganic gels have layered turbostratic molecular structure with similarities to C-S-H precipitating in hydrating cement paste. The organic molecules' chain length controls the interlayer spacing, which shows little to no shrinkage upon dehydration up to 105 degrees C. However, the structure gets distorted in the basal crystallite plane, in which dimer and trimer Si-polyhedra structures condense on a 2D hexagonal Ca-polyhedra layer. Cross-linked C-S-H gels display plate-like morphology with tendency toward stacking into agglomerates at the larger scale. If successfully realized in cement environment, e.g. high concentration seed, such novel organic-inorganic C-S-H gels could potentially provide cement-based matrices with unique properties unmatched by classical inorganic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据