4.3 Article

Direct exposure to mild heat stress stimulates cell viability and heat shock protein expression in primary cultured broiler fibroblasts

期刊

CELL STRESS & CHAPERONES
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 1033-1043

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12192-020-01140-x

关键词

Broiler; Fibroblasts; Heat shock protein; Mild heat stress; Viability

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program, through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2020R1I1A3A04038058]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1I1A3A04038058] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fibroblasts produce collagen which is mainly essential for repairing tissue damage and maintaining the structural integrity of tissues. However, studies have given scientific evidence about harmful effect of thermal manipulation in fibroblast. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the mild heat stress temperature which increased broiler fibroblast viability. The experiment was divided into two groups (37 degrees C and 41 degrees C), and each group was divided into five subgroups based on different incubation times (6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h) with three replications. In experimental group (41 degrees C), fibroblast viability increased significantly in 12 h but decreased in 72 h compared with control (37 degrees C). At 41 degrees C, live cell increased significantly in 24 h and then declined in 48 h as well as 72 h than control. Moreover, the S phase lengthened in shorter incubation time of experimental group compared with control. Protein and mRNA (HSP70, HSP60, and HSP47) expressions were significantly higher at 41 degrees C compared with 37 degrees C, but at the end of the experiment, HSP expression level was higher in both groups. Finally, this study recommended 41 degrees C as a mild heat stress temperature for increasing broiler fibroblast viability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据