4.3 Review

Effectiveness and safety of hypotension fluid resuscitation in traumatic hemorrhagic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

期刊

CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 463-471

出版社

VIA MEDICA
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0096

关键词

fluid resuscitation; restricted fluid resuscitation; hemorrhagic shock; hemorrhage; meta-analysis; systematic review

资金

  1. ERC Research Net
  2. Polish Society of Disaster Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the effect of hypotensive versus conventional fluid resuscitation in traumatic hemorrhagic shock patients. The findings showed that hypotensive fluid resuscitation significantly reduced mortality and adverse events in hypovolemic shock patients.
Background: Although the resuscitation of an adult trauma patient has been researched and writ-ten about for the past century, the ideal fluid strategy to infuse during the initial resuscitation period remains unresolved. This work was aimed at assessing the effect of hypotensive versus conventional resuscitation strategies in traumatic hemorrhagic shock patients on mortality, and the need for blood transfusions including adverse events. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the effect of hypo-tension versus conventional fluid resuscitation for traumatic hemorrhagic shock patients. Two reviewers independently performed the screening, data extraction, and bias assessment. The data analysis was completed using the Cochrane Collaboration's software RevMan 5.4. Results: Data from 28 RCTs on 4503 patients were included in the final meta-analysis. Patients re- ceiving hypotension fluid resuscitation compared with conventional fluid resuscitation experienced less mortality (12.5% vs. 21.4%; RR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.51-0.66; p < 0.001), fewer adverse events (10.8% vs. 13.4%; RR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.59-0.83; p < 0.001), including fever acute respiratory distress syn-drome (7.8% vs. 16.8%) or multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (8.6% vs. 21.6%). Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that hypotensive fluid resuscitation significantly reduced the mortality of hypovolemic shock patients. Findings are low in certainty and should be interpreted with caution. Therefore, there is an urgent need for larger, multicenter, randomized trials to confirm these findings. (Cardiol J 2022; 29, 3: 463-471)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据