4.8 Article

Effect of hot extrusion temperature on graphene nanoplatelets reinforced Al6061 composite fabricated by pressure infiltration method

期刊

CARBON
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 455-464

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.080

关键词

Al matrix composites; Graphene nanoplatelets; Hot extrusion; Deformation treatment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51771063, 51871073, 51871072, 61604086, U1637201, 51911530116]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M590280, 2017T100240]
  3. Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Foundation [LBH-Z16075]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [NSRIF.20161, 201615]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, 0.6 wt% graphene nanoplatelets reinforced 6061Al (GNPs/6061Al) composite was prepared by pressure infiltration process and hot extruded (HE) at 420 degrees C-500 degrees C in order to investigate the evolution of GNPs in different extrusion temperature, which has not been reported yet. The GNPs agglomeration were eliminated by extrusion and were arranged in an orientation. In the sample extruded at 420 degrees C, the dispersion effect was not significant and agglomeration of large-sized GNPs was still found. However, the agglomeration of the GNPs was eliminated when extruded at 450 degrees C, and waved structure, exfoliation and bend of GNPs were observed. While in the sample at 500 degrees C, interlayer sliding of GNPs and interfacial reaction product Al4C3, due to excessively high extrusion temperature, were detected. The composites extruded at 450 degrees C showed the highest yield strength and ultimate tensile strength of 389 MPa and 500 MPa, respectively, which increased 16.8% and 40.1% comparing with the unreinforced matrix. The present results indicate that the uniform dispersion of graphene is still one of the main challenges in Graphene/Al composites, while the deformation treatment provides the possibility of further dispersion of graphene. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据