4.7 Article

MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy

期刊

CANCER
卷 126, 期 19, 页码 4423-4431

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33100

关键词

cancer; gastrointestinal; guidelines; mucositis; Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC; ISOO); oral

类别

资金

  1. Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and International Society for Oral Oncology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Mucositis is a significant toxicity of cancer therapy with numerous systemic sequelae. The goal of this systematic review was to update the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of mucositis. Methods The literature was reviewed systematically to identify interventions for mucositis. Studies were rated according to the presence of major and minor flaws according to previously published criteria. The body of evidence for each intervention and in each treatment setting was assigned a level of evidence based on previously published criteria. Guidelines were developed based on the level of evidence, with 3 possible guideline determinations:recommendation,suggestion, orno guideline possible. Results The guideline covers evidence from 1197 publications related to oral or gastrointestinal mucositis. Thirteen new guidelines were developed for or against the use of various interventions in specific treatment settings, and 11 previous guidelines were confirmed after aa review of new evidence. Thirteen previously established guidelines were carried over because there was no new evidence for these interventions. Conclusions The updated MASCC/ISOO Clinical Practice Guidelines for mucositis provide professional health caregivers with a clinical setting-specific, evidence-based tool to help with the management of mucositis in patients who have cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据