4.4 Article

CeO2-CrOy/γ-Al2O3 redox catalyst for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propylene

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 99, 期 1, 页码 235-250

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.23824

关键词

oxidative dehydrogenation; oxygen capacity; propane; propylene; supported chromium catalyst

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, CeO2-CrOy loaded on gamma-Al2O3 was used for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane, with factors influencing propylene selectivity including thermal cracking of propane and competition for lattice oxygen. The optimal reaction temperature for higher propylene yield was found to be 550-575 degrees Celsius for the 17.5Cr-2Ce/Al catalyst.
CeO2-CrOy loaded on gamma-Al2O3 was investigated in this work for the oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) of propane under oxygen-free conditions. The ODH experiments of propane were conducted in a fluidized bed at 500 degrees C-600 degrees C under 0.1 Mpa. The prepared catalyst was characterized by N-2 adsorption-desorption measurements, H-2-temperature-programmed reduction, O-2-temperature-programmed desorption, NH3-temperature-programmed desorption, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and x-ray diffraction. The change in the selectivity of propylene resulted from the thermal cracking of the propane and the competition for lattice oxygen in the catalyst between propylene formation and propane and propylene combustion. Therefore, to achieve higher propylene yield in the industry, the reaction temperature should be 550 degrees C-575 degrees C for the 17.5Cr-2Ce/Al catalyst. The results of H-2-TPR (from 0.2218 mmol/g-0.3208 mmol/g) revealed that the addition of CeO2 can enhance the oxygen capacity of CrOy. Compared with that for 17.5Cr/Al, the conversion can be enhanced from 22.4% to 28.5% and the selectivity of propylene can be improved from 72.2% to 75.9% for the 17.5Cr-2Ce/Al catalyst. In addition, CeO2 can inhibit the evolution of lattice oxygen (O2-) to electrophilic oxygen species (O-2(-)), causing the average COx (CO and CO2) selectivity to decrease from 9.64% to 6.31%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据