4.2 Article

Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer: Bridging the Gap Between Computational Power and Clinical Decision-Making

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0846537120941434

关键词

artificial intelligence; machine learning; radiomics; quantitative imaging; lung cancer

资金

  1. Lawson Health Research Institute's Internal Research Fund (IRF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Artificial intelligence is increasingly being developed for outcome prediction in lung cancer, showing potential in screening, diagnosis, treatment selection, and decision-making. However, rigorous validation and standardization are needed before clinical implementation. Imaging plays a crucial role in AI applications, advancing personalized medicine.
Lung cancer remains the most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Recent advances in lung cancer screening, radiotherapy, surgical techniques, and systemic therapy have led to increasing complexity in diagnosis, treatment decision-making, and assessment of recurrence. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based prediction models are being developed to address these issues and may have a future role in screening, diagnosis, treatment selection, and decision-making around salvage therapy. Imaging plays an essential role in all components of lung cancer management and has the potential to play a key role in AI applications. Artificial intelligence has demonstrated value in prognostic biomarker discovery in lung cancer diagnosis, treatment, and response assessment, putting it at the forefront of the next phase of personalized medicine. However, although exploratory studies demonstrate potential utility, there is a need for rigorous validation and standardization before AI can be utilized in clinical decision-making. In this review, we will provide a summary of the current literature implementing AI for outcome prediction in lung cancer. We will describe the anticipated impact of AI on the management of patients with lung cancer and discuss the challenges of clinical implementation of these techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据