4.4 Article

Joint Focal Mechanism Inversion Using Downhole and Surface Monitoring at the Decatur, Illinois, CO2 Injection Site

期刊

出版社

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0120200075

关键词

-

资金

  1. Climit program of Gassnova [618233]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy through the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) [DE-FC26-05NT42588]
  3. Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, Office of Coal Development through the Illinois Clean Coal Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The three-year CO2 injection period at the Illinois Basin - Decatur Project site (Decatur, Illinois, United States) produced a number of microseismic events distributed in very distinct spatiotemporal clusters with different orientations. Further characterization of the microseismicity encompasses the determination of the event source mechanisms. Initially, the microseismic monitoring network consisted solely of borehole sensors, but has been extended with surface sensors, thereby significantly improving the data coverage over the focal sphere. This article focuses on 23 events from the northernmost microseismic cluster (about 2 km from the injection point) and takes advantage of both, surface and downhole, recordings. The resulting strike-slip east west-oriented focal planes are all consistent with the east west orientation of the cluster in map view. The injection-related increase of pore pressure is far below the formation fracture pressure; however, small stress-field changes associated with the pore-pressure increase may reach as far as to the investigated cluster location. Monte Carlo modeling of the slip reactivation potential within this cluster showed that the observed maximum stress-field orientation of N068 degrees is the optimum orientation for fault reactivation of the east west-oriented cluster. Our results suggest that the east west orientation of the investigated cluster is the main reason for its activation, even though the cluster is about 2 km away from the low-pressure injection point.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据