4.6 Article

Bridging the Age Gap: a prognostic model that predicts survival and aids in primary treatment decisions for older women with oestrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 107, 期 12, 页码 1625-1632

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11748

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme [RP-PG-1209-10071]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background A prognostic model was developed and validated using cancer registry data. This underpins an online decision support tool, informing primary treatment choice for women aged 70 years or older with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Methods Data from women diagnosed between 2002 and 2010 in the English Northern and Yorkshire and West Midlands regions were used to develop the model. Primary treatment options of surgery with adjuvant endocrine therapy or primary endocrine therapy were compared. Models predicting the hazard of breast cancer-specific mortality and hazard of other-cause mortality were combined to derive survival probabilities. The model was validated externally using data from the Eastern Cancer Registration and Information Centre. Results The model was developed using data from 23 842 women, and validated externally on a data set from 14 526 patients. The overall model calibration was good. At 2 and 5 years, predicted mortality from breast cancer and other causes differed from the observed rate by less than 1 per cent. At 5 years, there were slight overpredictions in breast cancer mortality (2629 predictedversus2556 observed deaths;P = 0 center dot 142) and mortality from all causes (6399versus6320 respectively;P = 0 center dot 583). The discrepancy varied between subgroups. Model discrimination was 0 center dot 75 or above for all mortality measures. Conclusion A prognostic model for older women with oestrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer was developed and validated in the present study. This forms a basis for an online decision support tool ().

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据