4.5 Review

Comparison of high-dose intracisterna magna and lumbar puncture intrathecal delivery of AAV9 in mice to treat neuropathies

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1739, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146832

关键词

Adeno-associated virus; Intrathecal; Intracisterna Magna; Lumbar Puncture; Neuropathy; Peripheral Nervous System

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS 095515, HD 040127, NS 087175, NS 095867]
  2. Hannah's Hope Fund
  3. NCI [5P30CA016080-42]
  4. NIH [U54-CA156733]
  5. NIEHS [3P30 EOS01012617]
  6. NCBT [2015-IDG-1007]
  7. UCRF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene therapy clinical trials for neurological disorders are ongoing using intrathecal injection of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector directly into the cerebral spinal fluid. Preliminary findings from these trials and results from extensive animal studies provides compelling data supporting the safety and benefit of intrathecal delivery of AAV vectors for inherited neurological disorders. Intrathecal delivery can be achieved by a lumbar puncture (LP) or intracisterna magna (ICM) injection, although ICM is not commonly used in clinical practice due to increased procedural risk. Few studies directly compared these delivery methods and there are limited reports on transduction of the PNS. To further test the utility of ICM or LP delivery for neuropathies, we performed a head to head comparison of AAV serotype 9 (AAV9) vectors expressing GFP injected into the cisterna magna or lumbar subarachnoid space in mice. We report that an intrathecal gene delivery of AAV9 in mice leads to stable transduction of neurons and glia in the brain and spinal cord and has a widespread distribution that includes components of the PNS. Vector expression was notably higher in select brain and PNS regions following ICM injection, while higher amounts of vector was found in the lower spinal cord and peripheral organs following LP injection. These findings support that intrathecal AAV9 delivery is a translationally relevant delivery method for inherited neuropathies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据