4.4 Article

Spontaneous sensations reveal distorted body perception in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)

期刊

BRAIN AND COGNITION
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105568

关键词

Complex regional pain syndrome; Body awareness; Body perception; Body representation distortion; Spontaneous sensations

资金

  1. LABEX CORTEX of the University of Lyon, under the Investissements d'Avenir program [ANR-11-LABX-0042, ANR-11-IDEX-0007]
  2. SFETD (French Society for the Study and Treatment of Pain)/APICIL Foundation (Association of Interprofessional Provident Institutions for Executives and Engineers of the Lyon region)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Distortions of body representation have been reported in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). The perception of sensations arising without external triggers (spontaneous sensations or SPS) was assessed here as a means of investigating distortions of body representation and awareness in CRPS. To avoid confounds between CRPS symptoms and SPS, lower-limb CRPS patients were included, whereas SPS were tested on the hands. Patients and controls were required to focus on their hands and to report the spatial and qualitative characteristics of SPS arising there. We found an ipsilateral decrease in the perception of thermal, pain-related and surface/mechanical SPS, as well as in the number of SPS-sensitive areas. The latter finding was predicted by decreased body awareness as assessed through questionnaires. A bilateral decrease in the perception of paresislike SPS was also observed. Finally, the ipsilateral spatial distribution of SPS frequency and intensity underwent a shift from the fingers towards the lower parts of the palm. CRPS is likely to distort patient's body perception and awareness of the entire half-body ipsilateral to the affected limb, and even of both sides. Such disturbances are not manifested solely as a decrease in sensitivity, but sometimes as shifts in the spatial distribution of sensitivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据