4.7 Article

SLC12A2 variants cause a neurodevelopmental disorder or cochleovestibular defect

期刊

BRAIN
卷 143, 期 8, 页码 2380-2387

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa176

关键词

corticogenesis; neurodevelopmental disorder; de novo mutation; exome; brain

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Health Innovation Challenge Fund [HICF1009-003]
  3. Department of Health
  4. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute [WT098051]
  5. National Institutes of Health [GM118944, DK093501, R01DK110375]
  6. Department of Health's National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The SLC12 gene family consists of SLC12A1-SLC12A9, encoding electroneutral cation-coupled chloride co-transporters. SCL12A2 has been shown to play a role in corticogenesis and therefore represents a strong candidate neurodevelopmental disorder gene. Through trio exome sequencing we identified de novo mutations in SLC12A2 in six children with neurodevelopmental disorders.All had developmental delay or intellectual disability ranging from mild to severe. Two had sensorineural deafness. We also identified SLC12A2 variants in three individuals with non-syndromic bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and vestibular areflexia. The SLC12A2 de novo mutation rate was demonstrated to be significantly elevated in the deciphering developmental disorders cohort.All tested variants were shown to reduce co-transporter function in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Analysis of SLC12A2 expression in foetal brain at 16-18 weeks post-conception revealed high expression in radial glial cells, compatible with a role in neurogenesis. Gene co-expression analysis in cells robustly expressing SLC12A2 at 16-18 weeks post-conception identified a transcriptomic programme associated with active neurogenesis. We identify SLC12A2 de novo mutations as the cause of a novel neurodevelopmental disorder and bilateral non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss and provide further data supporting a role for this gene in human neurodevelopment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据