4.5 Article

Unrelated cord blood transplantation with myeloablative conditioning for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission: prognostic factors

期刊

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 357-367

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-01019-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Practical Research Project for Allergic Diseases and Immunology (Research Technology of Medical Transplantation) from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED [19ek0510023h0002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study retrospectively analyzed data from 475 children and adolescents receiving UCBT for ALL, showing the 5-year survival rates and factors associated with UCBT, with a focus on the impact of HLA disparity.
The number of individuals undergoing unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT) has increased in recent years; however, information on prognostic factors is limited. We retrospectively analyzed data from 475 children and adolescents receiving UCBT with myeloablative conditioning for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in complete remission (CR), based on a nationwide registry. In the total patient cohort, 5-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) rates after UCBT were 61.1% and 67.7%, respectively. UCBT at first CR and UCBT after 2007 were associated with good survival, while grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was associated with low relapse rate but did not affect survival. Analysis according to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparity revealed that tacrolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis resulted in higher OS and lower relapse rate and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) than cyclosporine-based GVHD prophylaxis in patients transplanted with 6/6 and <= 4/6 HLA-matched umbilical cord blood. Furthermore, grade II-IV acute GVHD was associated with good LFS and low relapse rate, without high NRM, in patients receiving 5/6 HLA-matched UCBT. These data indicate that prognostic factors for ALL differ depending on HLA disparity in UCBT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据