4.6 Article

Changes in patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores in adults with medical authorization for cannabis

期刊

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09089-3

关键词

Depression; Major depressive disorder; Patient health questionnaire; PHQ-9; Medical cannabis

资金

  1. Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction using Health Canada Cannabis Research Initiative funds [CCSA 163022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundLegal access to medical cannabis is increasing world-wide. Despite this, there is a lack of evidence surrounding its efficacy on mental health outcomes, particularly, on depression. This study assesses the effect of medical cannabis on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores in adult patients between 2014 and 2019 in Ontario and Alberta, Canada.MethodsAn observational cohort study of medically authorized cannabis patients in Ontario and Alberta. Overall change in PHQ-9 scores from baseline to follow-up were evaluated (mean change) over a time period of up to 3.2years.Results37,338 patients from the cohort had an initial PHQ-9 score recorded with 5103 (13.7%) patients having follow-up PHQ-9 scores. The average age was 54yrs. (SD 15.7), 46% male, 50% noted depression at baseline. The average PHQ-9 score at baseline was 10.5 (SD 6.9), following a median follow-up time of 196days (IQR: 77-451) the average final PHQ-9 score was 10.3 (SD 6.8) with a mean change of -0.20 (95% CI: -0.26, -0.14, p-value <0.0001). Overall, 4855 (95.1%) had no clinically significant change in their PHQ-9 score following medical cannabis use while 172 (3.4%) reported improvement and 76 (1.5%) reported worsening of their depression symptoms.ConclusionsAlthough the majority showed no clinically important changes in PHQ-9 scores, a number of patients showed improvement or deteriorations in PHQ-9 scores. Future studies should focus on the parallel use of screening questionnaires to control for PHQ-9 sensitivity and to explore potential factors that may have attributed to the improvement in scores pre- and post- 3-6month time period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据