相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。The Effect of Implant Design on Sagittal Plane Stability: A Randomized Trial of Medial- versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty
Adam Edelstein et al.
JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY (2020)
Can Methods Developed for Interpreting Group-level Patient-reported Outcome Data be Applied to Individual Patient Management?
Madeleine T. King et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2019)
Normative Values for the Forgotten Joint Score-12 for the US General Population
Johannes M. Giesinger et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2019)
Early outcomes of patient-specific posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty implants
Benjamin Wheatley et al.
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS (2019)
Minimal important change values for the Oxford Knee Score and the Forgotten Joint Score at 1 year after total knee replacement
Lina H. Ingelsrud et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2018)
Application of minimal important differences in degenerative knee disease outcomes: a systematic review and case study to inform BMJ Rapid Recommendations
Tahira Devji et al.
BMJ OPEN (2017)
Validation of the English language Forgotten Joint Score-12 as an outcome measure for total hip and knee arthroplasty in a British population
D. F. Hamilton et al.
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2017)
Validation of the German Forgotten Joint Score (G-FJS) according to the COSMIN checklist: does a reduction in joint awareness indicate clinical improvement after arthroplasty of the knee?
Florian Baumann et al.
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY (2016)
Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty A retrospective cross-sectional survey-based study
Morten G. Thomsen et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2016)
Responsiveness and ceiling effects of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 following total hip arthroplasty
D. F. Hamilton et al.
BONE & JOINT RESEARCH (2016)
Validation study of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 as a universal patient-reported outcome measure
Mikio Matsumoto et al.
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (2015)
Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysis
Berend Terluin et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
Minimal Clinically Important Difference Defining What Really Matters to Patients
Anna E. McGlothlin et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2014)
Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty
K. Giesinger et al.
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE (2014)
Predicting patient satisfaction using the Oxford knee score: where do we draw the line?
Nicholas D. Clement et al.
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY (2013)
Total knee replacement; minimal clinically important differences and responders
A. Escobar et al.
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE (2013)
Patient-Reported Outcomes for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Commonly Used Instruments and Attributes of a Good Measure
Natalie J. Collins et al.
CLINICS IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE (2012)
The Forgotten Joint as the Ultimate Goal in Joint Arthroplasty Validation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
Henrik Behrend et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2012)
A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods
Madeleine T. King
EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2011)
Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes
Caroline B. Terwee et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
Dennis Revicki et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
分享论文
