4.3 Article

Characteristics of adult abdominal cystic Lymphangioma: a single-center Chinese cohort of 12 cases

期刊

BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01388-8

关键词

Abdominal cystic lymphangioma; Adult; Cystic lymphangioma; Surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundCystic lymphangioma is a rare, benign developmental disease, mostly affecting the cervical and axial regions. The clinical features of abdominal cystic lymphangioma (ACL) are reported among pediatric patients but are less well known in adults. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the clinical characteristics of ACL in Chinese adults and describe our experience in treating this disease.MethodsWe conducted a single-center, non-interventional, retrospective study of 12 adult patients with ACL admitted to Peking Union Medical College Hospital in Beijing, China from November 1984 through August 2017. The demographic, clinical, laboratory, imaging, histopathologic, and therapeutic data were collected.ResultsDetailed information on seven males and five females was available. The mean age at diagnosis was 39.1 (SD 17.3) years. The mean duration of follow-up was 6.9years. Six (50%) patients were asymptomatic, and abdominal pain was the leading symptom for three (25%) patients. The cysts were evaluated by ultrasound (n =8, 67%), CT (n =10, 83%), and MRI (n =4, 33%). Therapeutic modalities include laparotomy (n =6, 50%), laparoscopy (n=4, 33%), and aspiration (n =2, 17%), with variable outcomes. The mean postsurgical hospital stay was 6.8days. Complete excision was accomplished in eight patients, and one recurrence was observed during follow-up. Of patients who underwent partial resection, one experienced disease relapse.ConclusionsThis is the first report on an Asian cohort of adult patients with ACL. Typical imaging features could lead to timely diagnosis and treatment of ACL. Radical resection is recommended with a longer period of follow-up. The analysis of this cohort deepens our understanding of adult ACL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据