4.4 Article

The minimal informative monitoring interval of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with stable heart failure

期刊

BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12872-020-01537-7

关键词

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP); Heart failure; Minimal informative monitoring interval; Signal-to-noise ratio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a potential biomarker for monitoring the status of heart failure. However, the optimal monitoring interval of NT-proBNP is unknown. This study sought to investigate the minimal informative monitoring interval of NT-proBNP in patients with stable chronic heart failure. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients who were admitted due to heart failure and subsequently followed with serial NT-proBNP measurements in a tertiary hospital. We analyzed NT-proBNP measured between six months after discharge and the earliest timepoint of: an alteration of medication regimen, readmission due to worsening of heart failure, or all-cause death. To distinguish progression of the disease from biological variability and measurement error, the signal-to-noise ratio method was applied with a random-effects model. Results In the 368 patients included, NT-proBNP was measured for a median 6 times. In the random-effects model, signal (progression of disease) exceeded noise (biological variability and measurement error) at 7.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.1-9.6), while noise corresponded to a 61% increase from baseline. In stratified analysis using the AHEAD risk score, the minimal informative monitoring interval shortened as the risk score increased (0-1 point: 12.2 months [95%CI: 10.3-14.4]; 2-3 points: 8.0 months [95%CI: 6.8-9.7]; 4-5 points: 3.3 months [95%CI: 3.0-3.8]). Conclusions In patients with stable chronic heart failure, the minimal informative monitoring interval of NT-proBNP measurement was 7.9 months in the current population, which varied with underlying risks. The optimal monitoring interval could be lengthened for patients at lower risks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据