4.6 Article

Keras R-CNN: library for cell detection in biological images using deep neural networks

期刊

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-03635-x

关键词

Deep learning; Keras; Convolutional networks; Malaria; Object detection

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R01 GM089652, MIRA R35 GM122547]
  2. BWF
  3. Royal Society
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation [DGE1144152]
  5. FAPESP [2017/18611-7]
  6. HHMI Gilliam Fellowship
  7. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [17/18611-7] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A common yet still manual task in basic biology research, high-throughput drug screening and digital pathology is identifying the number, location, and type of individual cells in images. Object detection methods can be useful for identifying individual cells as well as their phenotype in one step. State-of-the-art deep learning for object detection is poised to improve the accuracy and efficiency of biological image analysis. Results: We createdKeras R-CNNto bring leading computational research to the everyday practice of bioimage analysts.Keras R-CNNimplements deep learning object detection techniques using Keras and Tensorflow (https://github.com/ broadinstitute/keras-rcnn). We demonstrate the command line tool's simplified Application Programming Interface on two important biological problems, nucleus detection and malaria stage classification, and show its potential for identifying and classifying a large number of cells. For malaria stage classification, we compare results with expert human annotators and find comparable performance. Conclusions: Keras R-CNNis a Python package that performs automated cell identification for both brightfield and fluorescence images and can process large image sets. Both the package and image datasets are freely available on GitHub and the Broad Bioimage Benchmark Collection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据