4.8 Article

Ultrasensitive magnetic DNAzyme-copper nanoclusters fluorescent biosensor with triple amplification for the visual detection of E. coli O157: H7

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112475

关键词

E. coli O157:H7; DNAzyme; Fluorescent biosensor; RCA; Magnetic beads; Copper nanocluster

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation Project of China [31871875]
  2. Key R&D Project of Yunnan Province: Social Development Field [2018BC006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A relatively-simple and high-efficient fluorescent magnetic biosensor based on DNAzyme was established for the detection of E. coli O157:H7. In order to solve the problem of weak signal and low sensitivity in the detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria, we ingeniously designed a fluorescent sensor based on triple signal amplification of magnetic beads, DNAzyme and photoluminescence. In the detection process, the E. coli-specific RNA-cleaving DNAzyme can specifically identify the target protein in crude intracellular mixture (CIM), which caused its conformation changes and induced rolling circle amplification (RCA) to the generation and luminescence of copper nanoclusters (CuNCs). This cascade amplification design can capture weak signals in the sample. The biosensor also indicated a good linear range from 10 CFU mL(-1) to 1000 CFU mL(-1) and obtained a limit of detection (LOD) of 1.57 CFU mL(-1), which showed a relatively high sensitivity compared with other studies. Furthermore, the biosensor displayed high-efficient detection capability in 1.5 h and good reproducibility (relative standard deviations < 2%). It has been proved that this sensor is feasible to the detection of E. coli O157: H7 in drinking water and apple juice. Moreover, we found that the final detection product can effectively wrap the magnetic beads and can be driven by the magnetic field. And this unexpected discovery will provide ideas for the development of biosensing robots.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据