4.7 Article

Improved operational stability of mediated glucose enzyme electrodes for operation in human physiological solutions

期刊

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2020.107460

关键词

Enzyme electrode; Osmium redox polymer; Glucose oxidase; FADGDH; Human plasma; Uric acid

资金

  1. NUI Galway College of Science fellowship
  2. Irish Research Council [GOIPG/2016/505]
  3. Irish Research Council (IRC) [GOIPG/2016/505] Funding Source: Irish Research Council (IRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stability of glucose-oxidising enzyme electrodes is affected by substances in physiological solutions, hampering deployment as long-term implantable biosensors or fuel cells. The performance of Nafion over-coated enzyme electrodes, consisting of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and flavin adenine dinucleotide-dependent glucose dehydrogenase (FADGDH) or glucose oxidase (GOx) crosslinked with osmium-complex based redox polymer, was compared to uncoated electrodes in presence of uric acid and artificial plasma. Nafion over-coating resulted in lower glucose oxidation current densities compared to no over-coating. The highest initial current density for Nafion over-coated electrodes in artificial plasma in 100 mM glucose was 8.0 +/- 2.0 mA cm(-2) for GOx electrodes with 0.5% w/v Nafion coating. These electrodes retained 83% of initial current after 12 h continuous operation in artificial plasma while similarly prepared FADGDH electrodes retained 58% signal. This is compared to retention of only 73% or 31% observed for GOx or FADGDH electrodes in artificial plasma with no Nafion membrane. Enzyme electrodes over-coated with Nafion maintain improved signal stability when tested continuously in the presence of uric acid, identified as being the main contributing substance to FADGDH enzyme electrode instability, showing promise for application to continuous use glucose-oxidising enzyme electrodes. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据