4.7 Article

Methionine restriction alleviates high-fat diet-induced obesity: Involvement of diurnal metabolism of lipids and bile acids

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165908

关键词

Methionine restriction; High-fat diet; Circadian clock; Lipid metabolism; Bile acid metabolism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871118]
  2. Innovative Talent Promotion Program-Technology Innovation Team of Shaanxi [2019TD-006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Circadian misalignment induced by a high-fat diet (HFD) increases the risk of metabolic diseases. Methionine restriction (MR) is known to have the potential of alleviating obesity by improving insulin sensitivity. However, the role of the circadian clock in mediating the effects of MR on obesity-related metabolic disorders remains unclear. Ten-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice were fed with a low-fat diet (LFD) or a HFD for 4 wk., followed with a full diet (0.86% methionine, w/w) or a methionine-restricted diet (0.17% methionine, w/w) for 8 wk. Our results showed that MR attenuated insulin resistance triggered by HFD, especially at ZT12. Moreover, MR led to a time-specific enhancement of the expression of FGF21 and activated the AMPK/PGC-1 alpha signaling. Notably, MR upregulated the cyclical levels of cholic acid (CA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), and downregulated the cyclical level of deoxycholic acid (DCA) in the dark phase. MR restored the HFD-disrupted cyclical fluctuations of lipidolysis genes and BAs synthetic genes and improved the circulating lipid profile. Also, MR improved the expressions of clock-controlled genes (CCGs) in the liver and the brown adipose tissue throughout one day. In conclusion, MR exhibited the lipid-lowering effects on HFD-induced obesity and restored the diurnal metabolism of lipids and BAs, which could be partly explained by improving the expression of CCGs. These findings suggested that MR could be a potential nutritional intervention for attenuating obesity-induced metabolic misalignment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据