4.7 Article

Antisense drug discovery and development technology considered in a pharmacological context

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 189, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114196

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ionis Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the application and comparison of antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNA (siRNA) in a pharmacological context. While the two approaches share common features, they also have significant differences in terms of chemical modifications, mechanisms of action, and pharmacokinetic properties.
When coined, the term antisense included oligonucleotides of any structure, with any chemical modification and designed to work through any post-RNA hybridization mechanism. However, in practice the term antisense has been used to describe single stranded oligonucleotides (ss ASOs) designed to hybridize to RNAs while the term siRNA has come to mean double stranded oligonucleotides designed to activate Ago2. However, the two approaches share many common features. The medicinal chemistry developed for ASOs greatly facilitated the development of siRNA technology and remains the chemical basis for both approaches. Many of challenges faced and solutions achieved share many common features. In fact, because ss ASOs can be designed to activate Ago2, the two approaches intersect at this remarkably important protein. There are also meaningful differences. The pharmacokinetic properties are quite different and thus potential routes of delivery differ. ASOs may be designed to use a variety of post-RNA binding mechanisms while siRNAs depend solely on the robust activity of Ago2. However, siRNAs and ASOs are both used for therapeutic purposes and both must be and can be understood in a pharmacological context. Thus, the goals of this review are to put ASOs in pharmacological context and compare their behavior as pharmacological agents to the those of siRNAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据