4.2 Article

Chemogenetic Inhibition of Dopaminergic Projections to the Nucleus Accumbens Has Sexually Dimorphic Effects in the Rat Gambling Task

期刊

BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 134, 期 4, 页码 309-322

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/bne0000372

关键词

Iowa gambling task; nucleus accumbens; impulsivity; risky decision-making; addiction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Women and men can differ in their propensity to take risks and develop impulse control and addiction disorders. Sexual dimorphisms in behavioral control by the mesolimbic dopaminergic reward system may underlie these phenomena, given its sensitivity to gonadal hormones. However, this is hard to test experimentally using humans. Using the rat gambling task (rGT), we investigated what impact acute inhibition of accumbal dopamine had on decision-making and impulsivity in animals of both sexes. We expressed an inhibitory designer receptor exclusively activated by designer drugs (hM4D[Gi]) in the accumbal dopaminergic efferents of female and male transgenic (Tg) rats. engineered to selectively express ere recombinase in neurons synthesizing tyrosine hydroxylase. We then trained the rats to perform the rGT and assessed the effect of an acute clozapine-n-oxide (0-3 mg/kg) challenge. Chemogenetic inhibition of dopaminergic projections to the accumbens did not affect choice in females. perhaps due to low levels of risky choice in Tg+ animals at baseline. but induced a switch from risky to optimal decision-making in males performing the cued rGT. This manipulation also decreased motor impulsivity ha only in females. These data support the hypothesis that cue-driven risky choice is mediated, at least in males, by activity of accumbal dopaminergic neurons. However, motor impulsivity is more sensitive to inhibition of accumbal dopamine neurons in female rats. These data may help explain differences in the manifestation of addictions across gender and reinforce the importance of examining both sexes when seeking to attribute control of behavior to specific monoaminergic pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据