4.5 Article

Actions of multiple doses of resveratrol on oxidative and inflammatory markers in plasma and brain of healthy and arthritic rats

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13475

关键词

catalase; lipid damage; myeloperoxidase; protein damage; thiol levels; xanthine oxidase

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. CoordenacAo do Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal do Ensino Superior (CAPES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resveratrol exhibited anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects in rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis, with dose-dependent responses observed. It may serve as an adjuvant to conventional antirheumatic drugs.
The actions of resveratrol in brain and plasma of rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis were investigated. Resveratrol was administered orally during a period of 23 days. A major concern of the present work was to explore an ample range of daily doses (10-200 mg/kg). Several oxidative and inflammatory markers were measured. Important effects of resveratrol treatment were the normalization of the plasma myeloperoxidase activity (inflammatory marker), the normalization of the brain xanthine oxidase activity (reactive oxygen species source) and the near-normalization of the catalase activity in the brain (antioxidant defence). These effects presented obvious dose dependencies in the range up to 200 mg/kg. Resveratrol also reduced protein and lipid damage within the lowest dose ranges investigated, and its action as a free radical scavenger activity was enhanced in brain mitochondria of arthritic rats. Resveratrol failed in restoring the diminished albumin levels and plasma protein thiols in arthritic rats. The latter, however, were substantially increased in healthy rats at low doses (up to 50 mg/kg), a sign of antioxidant action. This increase was reversed at higher doses, a sign of pro-oxidant action. The observations agree with the notion that low doses of resveratrol might be useful as an adjuvant to the conventional antirheumatic drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据