4.8 Article

Open questions for harnessing autophagy-modulating drugs in the SARS-CoV-2 war: hope or hype?

期刊

AUTOPHAGY
卷 16, 期 12, 页码 2267-2270

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1779531

关键词

Anti-viral; COVID-19; hydroxychloroquine; immunology; infection; inflammation; lysophagy; microbiology; plaquenil; virophagy

资金

  1. French Government (Agence Nationale de Recherche, ANR) through the Investments for the Future LABEX SIGNALIFE [ANR-11-LABX-0028-01, R19162DD]
  2. CANC'AIR Genexposomic project, Canceropole PACA
  3. DREAL PACA, ARS PACA, Region Sud, INSERM
  4. INCA Plan Cancer
  5. Children Medical Safety Research Institute (CMSRI) [R17033DJA]
  6. NIGMS [GM131919]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

At a time when the world faces an emotional breakdown, crushing our dreams, if not, taking our lives, we realize that together we must fight the war against the COVID-19 outbreak even if almost the majority of the scientific community finds itself confined at home. Every day, we, scientists, listen to the latest news with its promises and announcements. Across the world, a surge of clinical trials trying to cure or slow down the coronavirus pandemic has been launched to bring hope instead of fear and despair. One first proposed clinical trial has drawn worldwide hype to the benefit of chloroquine (CQ), in the treatment of patients infected by the recently emerged deadly coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). We should consider this information in light of the long-standing anti-inflammatory and anti-viral properties of CQ-related drugs. Yet, none of the articles promoting the use of CQ in the current pandemic evoked a possible molecular or cellular mechanism of action that could account for any efficacy. Here, given the interaction of viruses with macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy), a CQ-sensitive anti-viral safeguard pathway, we would like to discuss the pros, but also the cons concerning the current therapeutic options targeting this process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据