4.7 Article

The EU-ToxRisk method documentation, data processing and chemical testing pipeline for the regulatory use of new approach methods

期刊

ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY
卷 94, 期 7, 页码 2435-2461

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02802-6

关键词

GIVIMP; In vitro toxicology; Nuclear receptor; Metadata; Data processing

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [681002]
  3. Doerenkamp-Zbinden foundation
  4. Konstanz Research School Chemical Biology (KoRS CB)
  5. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
  6. InViTe graduate school

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hazard assessment, based on new approach methods (NAM), requires the use of batteries of assays, where individual tests may be contributed by different laboratories. A unified strategy for such collaborative testing is presented. It details all procedures required to allow test information to be usable for integrated hazard assessment, strategic project decisions and/or for regulatory purposes. The EU-ToxRisk project developed a strategy to provide regulatorily valid data, and exemplified this using a panel of > 20 assays (with > 50 individual endpoints), each exposed to 19 well-known test compounds (e.g. rotenone, colchicine, mercury, paracetamol, rifampicine, paraquat, taxol). Examples of strategy implementation are provided for all aspects required to ensure data validity: (i) documentation of test methods in a publicly accessible database; (ii) deposition of standard operating procedures (SOP) at the European Union DB-ALM repository; (iii) test readiness scoring accoding to defined criteria; (iv) disclosure of the pipeline for data processing; (v) link of uncertainty measures and metadata to the data; (vi) definition of test chemicals, their handling and their behavior in test media; (vii) specification of the test purpose and overall evaluation plans. Moreover, data generation was exemplified by providing results from 25 reporter assays. A complete evaluation of the entire test battery will be described elsewhere. A major learning from the retrospective analysis of this large testing project was the need for thorough definitions of the above strategy aspects, ideally in form of a study pre-registration, to allow adequate interpretation of the data and to ensure overall scientific/toxicological validity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据