4.4 Article

An alphanumeric classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries

期刊

ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY
卷 141, 期 5, 页码 861-869

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03546-9

关键词

Pelvic ring injury; Pelvic ring fracture; Pelvic fracture; Osteoporotic fracture; Fragility fracture; Insufficiency fracture; Pelvis; Osteoporosis; Classification; Reliability; Low-energy; FFP classification

资金

  1. University of Innsbruck
  2. Medical University of Innsbruck

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proposed ANC for OPRI demonstrated overall reliability comparable to that of the FFP classification. The ANC, however, is simple, more comprehensive, and consistently relates to injury severity.
Introduction Classification and management of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries (OPRI) continue to pose a considerable challenge to orthopaedic traumatologists. The currently used fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) classification of OPRI has recently been shown to have significant weaknesses. The aim of this study therefore was to propose a new, simple, yet comprehensive alphanumeric classification (ANC) of OPRI and to assess its intra- and interobserver reliability. Furthermore, its potential advantages over the FFP classification are discussed. Materials and methods One hundred consecutive CT scans from patients with OPRI were evaluated by three orthopaedic traumatologists with varying levels of experience and one musculoskeletal radiologist. Intra- and interobserver reliability of the proposed classification system was assessed using weighted kappa (kappa) statistics and percentage agreement. In addition, the Fleiss' kappa statistic was computed to assess interobserver agreement among all four raters. Results Overall intraobserver reliability of the proposed ANC was substantial [kappa ranging from 0.71 to 0.80; percentage agreement: 70% (range, 67-76%)]. Overall interobserver reliability between pairs of raters was substantial as well [kappa ranging from 0.61 to 0.68; percentage agreement: 58% (range, 53-61%)]. For ANC types, groups and subgroups, intra- and interobserver reliability were substantial to almost perfect. Interobserver agreement among all four raters was moderate to substantial, with Fleiss' kappa values of 0.48, 0.69, 0.71 and 0.52 for ANC overall, types, groups and subgroups, respectively. Conclusion The proposed ANC of OPRI demonstrated overall reliability comparable to that of the FFP classification. The ANC, however, is simple, more comprehensive, and consistently relates to injury severity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据