4.2 Article

Performance of RBI stabilized coal mine overburden material for haul road pavement

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES
卷 13, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-020-05649-4

关键词

Haul road pavement; CBR; UCS; Mine overburden Material; RBI grade-81

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an extensive laboratory investigation to develop composite materials using coal mine overburden and a stabilizer. The purpose of these composites is to be used as a pavement material for haul road. The physical-mechanical-chemical-micro-structural characteristics of these overburden materials like murrum, sub-soil and top-soil are evaluated before and after stabilization. Top-soil is the outermost layer of soil near the ground surface. Sub-soil is the layer of soil under the top-soil. It is composed of smaller particles such as sand, silt, and clay. Murrum is a very hard homogenous massive material enriched with iron and aluminum. Based on unified soil classification system, murrum is classified as clayey gravels (GC) while sub-soil is clayey sands (SC) and top-soil is organic silty clays of low plasticity (OL). It is found that apart from murrum, other materials are not suitable to be used without stabilization; hence, nine composites are developed using mine overburden and RBI grade-81. Laboratory study shows that the gain ratio of the developed composite is better than the previously developed fly ash-based composites by other researchers. Gain ratio is defined as the percentage increase in mechanical properties of overburden material after stabilization. The gain ratio for CBR and UCS is maximum with the top-soil, followed by sub-soil and murrum. The composite M94RBI6 (94% murrum and 6% RBI) showed highest strength values among all developed composites. All composites showed increased strength due to formation of cementitious gel. Surface morphology confirmed the formation of hydrated gel and Ettringite rods due to pozzolanic reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据