4.7 Article

Entrained flow coal gasification process simulation with the emphasis on empirical devolatilization models optimization procedure

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 175, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115401

关键词

Coal gasification; Entrained flow reactor; Devolatilization; CFD

资金

  1. National Science Centre (Poland) as part of Preludium 15 [2018/29/N/ST8/00799]
  2. Wroclaw Centre for Networking and Supercomputing [492]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modelling of entrained flow reactors is demonstrated and compared with experimental data. The current study is focused on the devolatilization modelling and its impact on gasification simulation results. An innovative procedure of optimizing input data to empirical devolatilization models is investigated, based on the complex phenomenological approach: the functional-group, depolymerization, vaporization, cross-linking (FG-DVC) model. The determined heating rates are used in detailed devolatilization calculations to find the optimized kinetic input to global empirical models. The study considers different approximation methods, i.e. the linear method, the exponential method and the minimization of the objective function, for the optimization procedure, focusing on their efficiency in volatile yield prediction. Performance of the optimization procedure is evaluated based on experimental data from two reactors: at Brigham Young University and University of Haute-Alsace. The first case considers entrained flow coal gasification. The investigation showed that uncertainties are present in the vicinity of the feedstock inlet during devolatilization. For this reason, further analysis was dedicated specifically to coal pyrolysis in an inert atmosphere. A significant influence of particle thermal history representation on the optimization procedure accuracy was reported. The optimization of global devolatilization models managed to improve the agreement with experimental data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据