4.8 Review

Hydrogen production via a two-step water splitting thermochemical cycle based on metal oxide - A review

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 267, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114860

关键词

Hydrogen; Two-step water splitting; Solar energy; Metal oxide; Chemical reactor

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2018MEE030]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21307075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen production via a two-step thermochemical cycle has attracted considerable research interest as it can directly utilize the heat of the high temperature reactor, which eliminates the need for power generation steps and increases energy efficiency, and is understood to be a promising method for producing hydrogen on an industrial scale. The thermochemical cycle uses a metal oxide as a catalyst and involves two steps: thermal reduction and water splitting. The cycle process only requires the input of heat and water to continuously regenerate hydrogen and oxygen, which has almost no impact on the environment and has the potential for sustainable development. Herein we reviewed the two-step thermochemical cycle with regard to reaction heat source, metal oxide characteristics, and chemical reactors. The performance of volatile and non-volatile metal oxides in the cycle reactions has been thoroughly investigated. To date, the most widely studied metal oxides are ZnO/Zn, SnO2/SnO, ceria-based oxides, and iron-based oxides. Among them, doped-ceria and iron-based oxides, which have high redox activities and cycle stabilities, are considered to be the most promising materials. The possibility of achieving large-scale industrial production and the perspective on future material development were also analyzed. It was proved that the poly-cation oxides (PCOs) studied have great potential for hydrolysis, and the use of oxygen transport membrane reactor provides a new perspective for solar hydrogen production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据