4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Performance analysis of a hollow fiber membrane-based heat and mass exchanger for evaporative cooling

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 271, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115238

关键词

Evaporative cooling; Heat and mass transfer; Hollow fiber membrane; Numerical simulation; Air-conditioning

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [xjj2018074]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, China [2018M631153]
  3. Key Scientific Research Innovation Team Project of Shaanxi Province, China [2016KCT-16]
  4. Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi, China [2020SF-396]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hollow fiber membrane-based semi-direct evaporative cooler (MSDEC) is proposed in this study to conduct a parametrical evaluation. The proposed direct evaporative cooling module is potentially considered as an effective strategy to eliminate the water droplet carryover issue without deteriorating the indoor air quality. A numerical model has been developed to obtain an in-depth understanding of the air treatment process. The model was compared with the experimental data to demonstrate its accuracy for predicting the air conditions in the membrane-based module. The heat and mass transfer performance of the module has been studied by employing the validated model. Simulation results indicated the capability of the proposed membrane-based module to cool and humidify the air. The performance of the membrane-based module has been studied by considering the impact of several key parameters including the inlet air velocity, the inlet air dry-bulb temperature, the inlet air relative humidity, the feed water velocity and the geometric dimensions. The wet-bulb effectiveness of the membrane-based module can be improved to 0.73 for an inlet air velocity of 0.5 m/s. The results were able to provide theoretical suggestions for the further optimized design and application of the hollow fiber membrane-based evaporative cooling module.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据